Sign Me Up Wage Web Warfare Against The Liberal Establishment
Subscribe To The GrassTopsUSA Action Alert

Improving the Presidential Nomination Process: Instantaneous Party Affiliation Changes
GrassTopsUSA Exclusive Commentary
By Gennady Stolyarov II
01-26-08 

In most states, both of the major political parties require that in order to be eligible to vote in a given party’s primary, a person must register as a member of that party well in advance of the actual primary election. This requirement is a major inequity to the Presidential nomination process. I believe it inhibits voters’ preferences from being represented in the primary results.

To improve the Presidential nomination process, I think it would make better sense for both parties, on the day of the actual primary, to permit voters to declare their party affiliation at the time they cast their ballots.

The current registration deadlines overlook a candidate’s ability to galvanize support, not only from long-time members of his party but from members of the other major party as well as from registered independents. These individuals, inspired by a candidate’s message, may wish to join that candidate’s party and support him in the primaries. Such decisions can be made at any time prior to a primary election. If a candidate campaigns strongly and convincingly, he will possibly persuade voter’s from outside of his party to support him. Such an accomplishment creates major benefits not only for the candidate, but his party as well.  

The current system in most states penalizes candidates who attract this kind of support by preventing new supporters from changing their party affiliations in time for their votes to count.

This proposal would not be impossible to implement. Several states have already done away with party registration deadlines and hold open primaries so voters can change their party affiliations at the polls. For the Republican primaries and caucuses, these states are Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. Some other states, such as New Hampshire, North Carolina, Rhode Island, and West Virginia, permit independents to vote in the Republican primaries. Thus, a total of 23 states have made some allowances for people to shift their party affiliation on or shortly before the primary. The remaining 27 states now need to implement open primaries and do away with their party registration deadlines.

The state that needs the most dramatic reform in its Presidential nomination process is Wyoming. The Republican nomination process in Wyoming does not even directly permit individual voters to select the candidate of their choice. This year, on August 22, 2007 – almost four and a half months prior to the January 5, 2008, Wyoming Conventions – voters elected delegates to these conventions from each county. Then, on January 5, the convention delegates voted to elect the delegates to the Republican National Convention. It is absurd to have the people’s input be so indirect and so early in the election season. After all, changes in public opinion can occur during four and a half months. In the Republican race, both Sam Brownback and Tom Tancredo dropped out between the election of the Wyoming delegates and the Wyoming conventions; furthermore, Ron Paul achieved tremendous gains in fundraising and public support, Mike Huckabee became one of the top three candidates, John McCain lost and then regained his frontrunner status, and Rudy Giuliani declined to fifth or sixth place in the polls and the Iowa caucuses. In addition, hundreds of debates, interviews, public statements, commentaries, and discussions involving the candidates took place. Surely, the voters need to be permitted to take this new information into consideration before making their choice.

In the Wyoming Conventions, Mitt Romney received the majority of delegates and approximately 67% of the vote.  In Iowa, Romney received 25% of the vote; in New Hampshire, he got 32%. In Michigan, Romney got his highest total so far from a direct vote – 39%. Even if Romney’s support in Wyoming exceeds the highest of these numbers, it is unlikely that it exceeds them by a factor greater than 1.7. Thus, it is likely that the nomination process in Wyoming has distorted what the voters really want; had they been permitted to vote in open primaries and to register with the Republican Party on the day of the primaries, the percentages for each candidate would have been different.

Arbitrary barriers representing voters’ true preferences need to be done away with.  This would ensure a fair nomination process and prevent voters from having to make a choice between the lesser of two evils on the day of the general election.

   

Gennady Stolyarov II is Editor-in-Chief of The Rational Argumentator, a magazine championing the principles or Reason, Rights, and Progress. His works have been published by Le Quebecois Libre, Enter Stage Right Magazine, the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Rebirth of Reason, and other organizations. Mr. Stolyarov can be contacted at gennadystolyarovii@yahoo.com.


GrassTopsUSA is a 501c4 not-for-profit organization.  Contributions are not tax deductible.

Copyright GrasstopsUSA.com 2007