Sign Me Up Wage Web Warfare Against The Liberal Establishment
Subscribe To The GrassTopsUSA Action Alert

Pinellas County Eviscerates Free Speech
GrassTopsUSA Exclusive Commentary
By Gennady Stolyarov II
10-31-07 

John, a resident from Pinellas County Florida thought that free speech and private property were still protected in this country. He thought that if he put up signs on his fence supporting his preferred presidential candidate, Ron Paul– that he would simply be exercising his inalienable constitutional rights. After all, not only does the United States Constitution protect free speech, but the Florida Constitution explicitly protects written speech.

One day John’s daughter informed him that the signs were mysteriously gone. At first John thought that the culprit was an angry individual playing dirty politics. So he put the signs back up. Two days later, John received a notice from the county demanding that he remove the signs immediately or face a $1000 per day fine. One of the county officials admitted that he had taken the signs down previously – without ever speaking to John regarding any violations or warning him about the presence of the signs. Without any regard for John’s private property rights, the county’s enforcement officer simply trespassed onto John’s land and stole the signs – no questions asked. To avoid the draconian fines, John had to acquiesce and remove the signs. A YouTube video entitled, “Ron Paul Signs not allowed in Florida,” documents the story in depth.

Oddly enough, John had placed other political signs on his fence in the past without the county ever raising any complaints. Over the last four years, he had displayed his political preferences for the local sheriff, the county commissioners, and state representatives without any objection from the county. When the county’s Department of Environmental Management presented John with a statement of the actual violation in this instance, it was clear that the charges were trumped up. The ordinance that John was accused of violating had nothing to do with political signs and it explicitly mentioned signs that were not of a political nature.

The county later informed John that the signs were removed because they were one foot from the public right of way – and the county requires them to be at least ten feet away. Yet, if this were the case, why didn’t the county officials mention John’s prior postings of other political signs on the same fence, the same distance from the public right of way? There is a glaring inconsistency here – and all evidence seems to suggest that the county’s actions against John were guided by political considerations. Someone among the county officials simply did not like Ron Paul and decided to use the county’s political authority to remove signs in his support – tossing aside John’s right of free speech as if it did not matter at all.

Anyone who still cherishes the founding principles and inalienable liberties at the heart of this country should be appalled at Pinellas County’s exercise of arbitrary power. Whether one believes Ron Paul to be a worthy candidate for the Presidency is not the issue here. If John had put up signs supporting Rudy Giuliani, Hillary Clinton, or any other candidate and the county officials had removed them, their abuse of power would have been identical. The right of free speech implies that any individual ought to have the liberty to use his own property to communicate advocacy for any political candidate he chooses. If Americans are no longer free to express their political preferences in such a basic manner, then what is left of free speech but a hollow, meaningless phrase?

It is understandable for a county government to place restrictions on private political advocacy on county property – since this property is funded by the tax contributions of those who might not agree with a political message. But to place any limits on how an individual might use his own private property to express his political views is sheer tyranny. If a man cannot put a sign on his own land, what is there that he is allowed to say or do?

Only if concerned citizens object to this violation of a free man’s sacred liberties can future travesties be averted. The following contact information might assist those wishing to express their concern to the county officials.

 

Gennady Stolyarov II is Editor-in-Chief of The Rational Argumentator, a magazine championing the principles or Reason, Rights, and Progress. His works have been published by Le Quebecois Libre, Enter Stage Right Magazine, the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Rebirth of Reason, and other organizations. Mr. Stolyarov can be contacted at gennadystolyarovii@yahoo.com.


GrassTopsUSA is a 501c4 not-for-profit organization.  Contributions are not tax deductible.

Copyright GrasstopsUSA.com 2007