 Swift's manifesto, widely reprinted in the
homosexual community, became known to the general public when it was read into
the Congressional Record.
And once the statement was widely disseminated, radical homosexual groups started back-tracking and spinning.... they scoffed that the manifesto was nothing more than a humorous and satirical piece. But, remember what recently happened when Congressman Louie Gohmert, a former judge, and House Republicans tried to amend the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 so it did not offer protection to pedophiles. Liberals in the House went ballistic and voted down the amendment. Here's what Gohmert said as recounted by Human Events: “'When we tried to get the term sexual orientation narrowed down to where it didn’t include something like a pedophile... that was voted down on party lines... there are about 30 different types of sexual orientations, and they can include exhibitionism and voyeurism or things that are so offensive such as pedophilia or necrophilia and bestiality. The problem is that the supporters of this bill did not want to exclude any of those and even voted down the amendment that would have excluded pedophilia.'” "Gohmert pointed out the absurdity of the legislation as written which would warrant the prosecution of a woman under the federal hate crimes statues if she hits a flasher with her purse after he exposed himself to her. Exhibitionism is a protected sexual orientation under this bill. “'The one who did the flashing committed a local misdemeanor,' Gohmert said. 'The one who hit with the purse singled him out because he’s an exhibitionist, and therefore she has now committed a federal hate crime and is looking at felony time.'” This incident might perhaps explain why people are starting to call this legislation "The Pedophile Protection Act." Several weeks ago, extreme liberals in Congress quietly and stealthily passed so-called "hate crimes" legislation in the House of Representatives and were preparing to shot-gun this legislation through the Senate before you were any the wiser. But when we alerted you to what was happening and our elected officials heard your righteous indignation, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid put HR 1913, (S. 909 in the Senate) on the back-burner... hoping to sneak it through the Senate once the heat died down. And now it seems that Reid and extreme leftists think the time is right to try to sneak it through Congress again. Recent reports coming from the homosexual community indicate that Reid has promised to push this so-called "hate crimes" legislation to a vote at any time, either as a stand-alone bill or as a "poison pill" amendment to another, totally unrelated, bill. Liberals may try to sneak the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 through the Senate any day now. The time to make your voice heard is now. 
If button above does not work, use the hyperlink https://fs8.formsite.com/GrassTopsUSA/form405439540/secure_index.html or copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser and hit return. Did They Take Away Miss California USA, Carrie Prejean's, Crown Because She Believes Marriage Is Between One Man And One Woman? During the question-and-answer portion of the Miss USA competition, one of the judges, a "celebrity blogger" (whatever that is) by the name of Perez Hilton asked Prejean how she felt about Proposition 8 and "same-sex marriage." Of course, questions of a political nature are typically taboo in beauty pageants but that didn't matter to Hilton. It also didn't matter to Hilton that Prejean gave a very diplomatic answer. She even qualified her answer by saying that it was great that we lived in a country where people in individual states could vote on the matter. Then she added that she personally believed that marriage is between a man and a woman. The crowd cheered and Hilton became enraged (some might even say unbalanced), it didn't matter to Hilton that Prejean's answer was given with poise and kindness. It didn't matter that Prejean's answer didn't necessarily diminish Hilton's perceived "right" to engage in homosexual acts and call it a "marriage." What did matter to Hilton was that Prejean didn't agree, in totality, with Hilton; and for her blasphemy, she had to punished. He gave her a big fat zero which may have cost her the Miss USA crown. But Hilton wasn't through with Prejean... not yet. That night, being a celebrity blogger, apparently with something of a following, he posted a hateful, rant on YouTube.com. He screamed and called Prejean "a stupid B-----." Shortly thereafter, he "apologized," but hours later he took the half-hearted apology back and called Prejean a "c---." Hilton even drew obscene images over photographs of Prejean, scanned them, and posted them on the Internet. Did Hilton suffer any repercussions for his horrendous actions? Of course not, Donald Trump even said Hilton would be invited back again to be a judge. And what about Carrie Prejean? Apparently, denying Prejean the Miss USA crown wasn't enough. Miss USA officials in California, after staging a dog-and-pony press event with Trump... after assuring Prejean and the American people that the whole matter was forgotten... dead and buried... stripped her of her Miss California crown too. When pressed for a reason, they could only say that she had not lived up to her contractual obligations but have not given any specifics. But the message could not be clearer. If you disagree with the radical-homosexual community, you'll suffer the consequences.
If button above does not work, use the hyperlink https://fs8.formsite.com/GrassTopsUSA/form405439540/secure_index.html or copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser and hit return. And How Is The Prejean-Hilton Incident Related To So-Called Hate Crimes Legislation? Essentially, Hilton let the cat out of the bag. There is a very radical minority within the homosexual community that is passionately driven by an irrational hatred of normalcy (and Christianity in particular) and many of the individuals within that minority, because of this radical and passionate hatred, gravitate toward political activism. That's why certain individuals and organizations are often described as being part of the "radical homosexual movement." And these individuals and organizations control much of what is known as the "homosexual political movement," and while they posture and claim that they represent the greater homosexual community, such is not necessarily, or always the case. Many of these individuals within the "radical homosexual movement" are not motivated by things as supposedly noble-sounding as, "the right to live my life as I choose" or "the right to love whom I want to love." Perez Hilton may very well become the poster-child for the "radical homosexual movement." He may have inadvertently done this country an invaluable service by showing all of America the level of intense and irrational hatred that is behind the "radical homosexual movement." This is the same intense hatred that motivated those who tried to sue the Boy Scouts into bankruptcy for years because the Scouts would not allow homosexual pedophiles to become Scoutmasters. This is the same intense hatred that motivates people to burn down the homes of ministers (Rev. Chuck McIlhenny for example), desecrate the Eucharist in Catholic Churches and march in "gay-rights parades" where many dress freakishly and defiantly and proudly pantomime perverse acts for all, even innocent children, to see. And this is same the intense hatred that motivated many of those at the forefront of the movement to push so-called "hate crimes" legislation for years. You may believe, like Carrie Prejean, that marriage is between a man and a woman. No "hatred" is necessary to hold that believe, but, if you hold that belief, there are people out there that have an irrational and burning hatred toward you and have every intention of using this law to act on that hatred and force you into submission to their worldview. If you allow the Senate to pass the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 and you meet someone in this vocal and radical minority within the homosexual community, someone motivated by the same hatred that motivates men like Perez Hilton, on the street be very afraid... and be very silent. At the very least, don't be shocked if that person approaches you, asks you for your opinion on so-called "same-sex marriage," goes home, beats his head up against the wall until it's bloody, falsely claims to the authorities that your hateful words incited a violent act against him and then has you arrested for a "hate crime." And if you think the prospect of being falsely accused of a "hate crime" in such a manner sounds a little far-fetched... read on... it may shock you to find out that it happens with some frequency!
If button above does not work, use the hyperlink https://fs8.formsite.com/GrassTopsUSA/form405439540/secure_index.html or copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser and hit return. Is There An Epidemic Of Hate Crimes Or Is There An Epidemic Of Falsely Reporting Hate Crimes. That's hardly the "epidemic" that the proponents of "hate crimes" legislation cite as the reason why this federal law is so desperately needed. So why is it necessary to get a federal "hate crimes" law on the books? In 2000, a conservative clergyman sat in the Supreme Court gallery, listening as opposing sides argued a New Jersey case challenging the Boy Scouts’ exclusion of homosexuals. Thinking the clergyman who was sitting nearby was a fellow liberal, President Bill Clinton’s liaison to the homosexual community leaned over and confided to the clergyman: "We're not going to win this case, but that's OK. Once we get 'hate crime' laws on the books, we're going to go after the [Boy] Scouts and all the other bigots." If this sick bill becomes law, American society will see an unprecedented uprising of militant homosexuals, demanding that anyone who speaks against their agenda be hauled off to jail and charged with a “hate crime.” Actually, reporting bogus "hate crimes" may be much more of an "epidemic" than "hate crimes." A Family Research Council report cites just a few examples: “In Houston, a homosexual mugging victim was left for dead in a traditionally 'straight' section of town. The press initially covered it as a hate crime, but investigators soon found that the man had been assaulted elsewhere and transported there, 'to make it look like a hate crime.'" “In Salt Lake City, a homosexual teacher at first thought bias offenders had put signs in her yard to intimidate her, but some of her own homosexual students later confessed to doing it.” "In South Carolina, a lesbian was charged with giving false information to a police officer for saying that she was beaten; police contend she hired a man to beat her and then she reported it as a hate crime." John Leo, a columnist for U. S. News and World Report, has reported on bogus "hate crimes" for years. Here are several more examples: “Jerry Kennedy, a gay resident assistant at the University of Georgia, reported he had been the target of nine hate crimes over a period of three years, including three acts of arson. But during questioning, Kennedy admitted that he had set the fires.” "[A] lesbian student at Eastern New Mexico University said she had been attacked after her name was included with the names of seven professors on an antigay 'hit list' posted at a local Laundromat. Police arrested her after a surveillance camera at the Laundromat showed her posting the list.” “Two weeks after the murder of Matthew Shepard, a lesbian student at St. Cloud State University in Minnesota said two men shouted antigay slurs at her and then slashed her face. Outraged students raised nearly $12,000 as a reward for information about her attackers. Then the student confessed she had made up the story and cut her own face.” And while we're on the subject of Matthew Shepard, here's something that perhaps you didn't know about this young man who was supposedly killed because he was a homosexual... the young man who became a household name after his death and has hate crimes laws in many localities named in his memory, was not even killed because he was a homosexual. It's been known for years. The media knows it. The "radical homosexual movement" knows it. Legislators who pander to the radical homosexual movement know it. The two psychotic thugs who killed Shepard eventually admitted that they had planned to rob someone before they had even bumped into Shepard. The robbery went bad and they killed Shepard. This unfortunate young man was simply, and so very sadly, in the wrong place at the wrong time; and yet the "radical homosexual movement" continues, after all these years, to disgustingly exploit his memory. And yet, the monumental irony here must be stated. The most famous "hate crime" of all time is nothing more than a fabrication that is being perpetuated in a conspiratorial fashion by a single-minded special interest for the express purpose of promoting a hate-driven agenda. If we allow the Senate to pass this hateful "hate crimes" bill, do you believe bogus hate crime reports will increase or decrease?
If button above does not work, use the hyperlink https://fs8.formsite.com/GrassTopsUSA/form405439540/secure_index.html or copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser and hit return. According To The Extreme Left, It's Always Okay To Hate The Haters Dixon, a high-ranking administrator at the university and an African-American, wrote a letter to the editor objecting to the comparison of so-called "gay rights" with the civil rights struggles of African-Americans. In case you're wondering, here's what Dixon wrote: "As a Black woman... I take great umbrage at the notion that those choosing the homosexual lifestyle are 'civil rights victims.' Here's why. I cannot wake up tomorrow and not be a Black woman. I am genetically and biologically a Black woman and very pleased to be so as my Creator intended." That exercise of her First Amendment rights got her fired! Dixon's termination is not an isolated incident! Allstate Insurance Company fired Matt Barber for writing an article for a Christian publication on the medical risks of homosexual behavior during non-working hours. Boston public school teachers are threatened with termination if they fail to portray so-called "same-sex marriage" in a positive light. John Whitehead, writing for Dakota Voice, spells out exactly what is wrong with this so-called hate crimes bill. According to Whitehead, "it opens the door for federal law enforcement officials (whether it be agents from the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and so on) to crack down on undesirable behavior wherever it occurs. The problem, which few want to acknowledge for fear of being labeled politically incorrect, or worse homophobic, is that in order to crack down on hateful behavior, hateful thoughts and expression must also be targeted..." Whitehead also says: "On the whole, hate crime laws unnecessarily blur the distinction between what might be constitutionally protected, albeit deplorable, speech and criminal behavior. Eventually, this will spill over into criminalizing any kind of speech that any official in the echelons of government deems to be hateful or distasteful. Thus, hate crime laws... open the door for a whole new realm of prosecutions, namely thought crimes." [Emphasis Mine] This totalitarian bill, must never become law. And, make no mistake, if the Senate passes it. Barack Obama will sign it into law. The time to act is now. Speak now, or you may be forever forced (under penalty of law) to hold your peace.
If button above does not work, use the hyperlink https://fs8.formsite.com/GrassTopsUSA/form405439540/secure_index.html or copy and paste it into the address bar of your browser and hit return. Chris Carmouche
| |